Waste of money?

Posted by The Patri0t 29 November, 2005 |

http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/2691965/detail.html?qs=;s=54;w=400

I always wonder when I see such a “Project”.

Taj Mahal…

http://www.taj-mahal.net/
http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/Taj_Mahal.html

I read an article long ago of Javed Choudhry I agreed with him fully, on his point of view. Muslims when sticked to their religion “truely” were glorious. As soon as they got out of their religion’s teachings and become “Money Wasters”…they were…

Shah Jahan, fine, a great Muslim emporer, whatever he was. I don’t question that but was making “Taj Mahal” not a waste of money? It’s beautiful indeed, wonder of the World? I don’t question that. I don’t question love for his wife but was it not a waste of money? Why did his wife die? She died while giving birth to a child. After his wife’s death, he just lost control over him self, as in he was just sad and sad and sad about her and he decided to make “Taj Mahal” in her rememberance.

Around same time frame, the article said, Britain had a King too, he lost his wife while she was giving birth and instead of mourning for her for rest of his life and order “Wasting money on a Tomb for her”. He issued orders that gather young and energetic women from far away villages and cities, teach them the ups and downs and how to deal with child birth, send them back to their villages and cities and ask them to teach more and more women about it & if I hear that a woman has died while giving birth after this, the woman taking care of the birth case and family of the woman who died, they will have to answer me and I will not leave them alone.

Think for your self…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

No related posts.

Categories : General Tags :

Comments
December 2, 2005

Wow, I never knew about that British king. That’s a wonderful thing he did. Yes, I suppose it was a waste of money (the Taj Mahal). Throughout the ages, there has always been poverty and there always will be, and that money could have been put to better use in memory of his wife. Great post, worth reading! :)

Posted by -Sarah-
December 3, 2005

uuummm….well y dont we see the positive side of it?
Like millions of people from all over the world today come to c this wonder n imagine the amount of revenue thus being generated.
So many ppl r employed there.though Taj Mahal could not alleviate poverty or anything like that but the amount of happiness it has given to so many people….i think thats priceless..

N moreover throughout the ages…there has been poverty..does that mean that v stop building such monuments?There r so many such gr8 monuments in this world..Rashtrapati Bhavan at Delhi is another marvel…Qutub Minar n c Statue of Liberty…so these things will co-exist with poverty alleviation programmes.

Posted by Anonymous
December 4, 2005

dumb headed girl. i know wat the positive side is. huge revenues, people working there. people coming for happiness n bla bla bla.

what i tried to say is that he was a KING, he could have issued other orders too, not just making of Taj Mahal!!!

Posted by The Patri0t
Leave a comment

(required)

(required)